Does the term sustainability taste like a sandwich from the day before? Can we even speak for fish if we are not fish ourselves? And how far into the future do we need to look if we want to ensure a good life for future generations? At the first Sustainability Forum in Langenlois in Lower Austria in October 2016, heads were spinning. At the invitation of organic pioneer and sustainability expert Werner Lampert, and moderated by philosopher Konrad Paul Liessmann, 13 experts from the humanities, social sciences and natural sciences discussed the opportunities and limits of sustainability.
List of participants
1) What do we actually mean when we talk about sustainability?
The roots of the concept of sustainability go back to 18th century forestry. Is it still useful today or is it already "worn out", as the sociologist Harald Welzer provocatively put it? The discussion revealed the entire spectrum of opinions - from the preservation of a tried and tested term to its reinterpretation and alternative names such as justice or sustainability. Biologist and author Andrea Grill used the example of different languages to illustrate that even today, sustainable is not the same as sustainable. For example, the German "Nachhaltigkeit" refers to holding, the French "Resilience" to resilience and elasticity. The Italian "Durevolezza" and the Dutch "Duresamheit" emphasize the aspect of duration. The English term "sustainability" is translated first as future viability and only secondly as sustainability.
2) Is it enough to look at our children and grandchildren?
Sustainability is always fundamentally geared towards the future. To put it simply: as human beings, we want to act in such a way that our children and grandchildren will still find an environment worth living in. But is that enough? Shouldn't we be looking much further ahead and thinking in terms of geological eras? The literary scholar Eva Horn took up the currently hotly debated "Anthropocene" as the first geological era shaped by humans. She argued that since humans are changing the system of life on Earth, they are also responsible for the changing state of the planet in the long term. Political scientist Claus Leggewie disagrees: in his experience, concrete measures - for example on climate protection - can only be implemented if we address the next one or two generations.
3) What happens when the Chinese buy second cars?
This touched on another fundamental issue: solidarity. Many emerging countries are now moving into the middle class. A desirable development, but one that also has its limits.
"Today we have 1.5 cars per inhabitant in our latitudes, in China it is only 1 car. If everyone has a traffic density like ours, the planet will collapse," explained theologian Ingeborg Gabriel.
In order to enable people in other parts of the world to rise, the industrialized countries would have to give up some of their prosperity. But that would be difficult to achieve. Journalist Wolf Lotter called for alternatives to bans in order to motivate people towards sustainability. Organic pioneer Werner Lampert described positive experiences from his work with agricultural producers.
"When people are concerned with sustainability, they realize: I can't feed the animals what I take away from people. From that point on, there is solidarity."
4) Do we need to learn to feel ourselves and others again?
The willingness to show solidarity is essentially linked to personal feelings and experiences.
"Only when I feel, experience and believe something do I live it," emphasized Andrea Grill, for example.
The physician Henning Elsner sees vitality and feeling as deficits in our society. His conviction: We need a sense of coherence with which we can locate ourselves in the big picture in order to live - connected to the cycles of nature - in a participatory way with the earth. This allows us to perceive the world again "in such a way that we can sufficiently understand and influence what is happening around us". The philosopher Andreas Weber struck a similar chord with his call for a new vitality that connects to people's inner experience. Ecological commons are one example: In them, economic activity becomes a source of identity for the individual, resulting in participation in the greater whole.
5) Sustainability and capitalism - can they even go together?
But aren't sustainable action and a capitalist economic system contradictions in themselves? Yes, said economist Mathias Binswanger. For him, this system only works if growth continues. It is not possible to control sustainable behavior through prices:
"You would clearly know where you have to go. But there are currently no prices that would achieve this."
The historian Philipp Blom pointed out what had made Europe great - economic growth based on exploitation. And ironically, it is precisely this principle that is now bringing us to the abyss:
"Those who have little want more. And those who have a lot want to keep their privileges. To really change something, we need a deeper rethink."
And for this to happen, Blom believes that even more suffering is required.
6) How can people be reached and moved?
In the end, the practical framework determined the sustainability discourse: how can participation be achieved, which processes are suitable for mobilizing people? For legal philosopher Peter Strasser, people sense that something is no longer right when inequality becomes too great. The journalist Wolf Lotter even identified an "unculture of dishonesty", which was evident in the VW crisis, for example. Economist Mathias Binswanger also appealed for people to see that they are dissatisfied.
"Promises are constantly being made and not fulfilled. We need to focus more on what makes people dissatisfied."
The requirement is therefore to provide a platform for their needs and to restore confidence in the system. Sociologist Harald Welzer presented the "Open Society Initiative" in Germany, which he co-founded, as a positive example of a political-participative process that is proving very popular.
Host Werner Lampert drew his conclusions from the discussion at the Langenlois Sustainability Forum:
"What is needed to create a movement and to make real progress is a new form of discourse. We have to learn to talk to each other differently, to accept each other. Only by accepting each other will we be able to reach people."
First Sustainability Forum Langenlois: The participants
- Mathias Binswanger, Economist, St. Gallen (Switzerland)
- Philipp Blom, writer and historian, Vienna (Austria)
- Henning Elsner, physician and psychosomatist, Lahnstein (Germany)
- Ingeborg Gabriel, theologian, Vienna (Austria)
- Andrea Grill, biologist and writer, Vienna (Austria)
- Eva Horn, literary scholar, Vienna (Austria)
- Werner Lampert, sustainability expert and organic pioneer, Vienna (Austria)
- Claus Leggewie, political scientist, Essen (Germany)
- Konrad Paul Liessmann, philosopher, Vienna (Austria)
- Wolf Lotter, journalist and author, Köngen (Germany)
- Peter Strasser, legal philosopher, Graz (Austria)
- Andreas Weber, biologist, philosopher and writer, Berlin (Germany)














"Today we have 1.5 cars per inhabitant in our latitudes, in China it is only 1 car. If everyone has a traffic density like ours, the planet will collapse," explained theologian Ingeborg Gabriel.
"When people are concerned with sustainability, they realize: I can't feed the animals what I take away from people. From that point on, there is solidarity."
"Only when I feel, experience and believe something do I live it," emphasized Andrea Grill, for example.
"You would clearly know where you have to go. But there are currently no prices that would achieve this."
Super written blog! As a tax consultant, I think that sustainability is an important topic to think about! Best regards!